Strict interpretation of simpliciter limitation provisions in special statutes

Statutory provisions prescribing a specific time period for filing appeals or applications before quasi-judicial authorities are mandatory and compulsive rather than directory. The absence of additional peremptory words such as "shall" or "but not thereafter" does not render a statutory limitation period directory or subject to discretionary enlargement. Prescribed timelines in special statutes must be strictly adhered to, as they are enacted to ensure certainty, finality, and efficiency in administrative and corporate adjudications. In the absence of express statutory authority to condone delay, quasi-judicial bodies possess no jurisdiction to entertain belated proceedings beyond the prescribed period. (The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda | 2026 INSC 33)